Geotab vs Teletrac Navman UK 2026: Which Fleet System Is Better? Quick Answer
Geotab and Teletrac Navman are both advanced fleet-management platforms, but they are strongest in different areas.
Our starting view is:
Choose Geotab for comparison first if your priorities are deep vehicle data, EV fleet management, OEM connectivity, diagnostics and a highly extensible integration ecosystem.Choose Teletrac Navman for comparison first if your priorities are transport compliance, driver safety, video telematics, tachograph workflows and day-to-day operational fleet management.
Area Geotab Teletrac Navman
Best overall fit
Data-heavy, EV and integration-led fleets
Transport, compliance and safety-led fleets
GPS tracking
Yes
Yes
Driver behaviour
Strong
Major strength
Video telematics
Available through platform/ecosystem
Major strength
Tachograph/compliance
Available, including EU regulatory package
Major strength
Vehicle diagnostics
Major strength
Strong
Maintenance
Strong
Strong
EV fleet management
Major strength
Available
OEM connectivity
Major strength
Available
Integrations/API
Major strength
Strong
Daily vehicle checks
Available
Major strength
Driver coaching
Strong
Major strength
Pricing
Partner/quote based
Quote based
Our View Geotab is the stronger first comparison where the organisation wants to build around detailed vehicle data.
Its case is particularly strong where you need:
EV fleet management
fleet electrification planning
OEM vehicle data
diagnostics
custom integrations
highly flexible reporting and data architecture
Geotab currently supports rich EV data across 300+ models and provides EV suitability, charging and energy-management tools.
Teletrac Navman becomes particularly attractive where safety, compliance and transport operations are central.
Its TN360 platform combines live tracking with driver behaviour, video telematics, tachograph workflows, vehicle checks, maintenance and digitised operational workflows.
Compare Geotab, Teletrac Navman & Other Fleet Tracking Quotes
Free quotes • No obligation • Compare UK fleet-management providers
Key Takeaways
Geotab is particularly strong for fleet data, EVs, diagnostics, OEM connectivity and integrations. Teletrac Navman is particularly strong for compliance, video telematics, driver coaching and transport operations. Both provide advanced GPS tracking and driver-behaviour monitoring.
Geotab has the stronger specialist EV proposition. Teletrac Navman has the stronger native video-safety and coaching proposition. Teletrac Navman places heavy emphasis on tachograph workflows, daily vehicle checks and fleet compliance.
Geotab is particularly attractive to organisations that want to integrate fleet data deeply into other business systems.
Both support maintenance and diagnostics.
Both are suitable for larger and more complex fleets.
Our view: choose Geotab when data and electrification lead the decision; choose Teletrac Navman when compliance, safety and transport operations lead it.
How Do We Work?
Our comparisons are researched and reviewed by the Compare Your Business Costs editorial team using provider information, official UK guidance and business buying criteria. See how Compare Your Business Costs works .
Authored by: Ally Cox – Business Technology & B2B Services Specialist, 10+ years’ experience.
Reviewed by: James Ward .
Last Updated: October 2026
Contents
Geotab vs Teletrac Navman at a Glance
Feature Geotab Teletrac Navman
Live GPS tracking
Yes
Yes
Journey history
Yes
Yes
Geofencing
Yes
Yes
Driver behaviour
Yes
Yes
AI video
Available
Major strength
Driver coaching
Strong
Major strength
Tachograph workflows
Available
Major strength
Daily vehicle checks
Available
Major strength
Diagnostics
Excellent
Strong
Maintenance
Strong
Strong
EV management
Excellent
Available
OEM connectivity
Excellent
Available
API/integrations
Major strength
Strong
Transport workflow
Available through ecosystem
Major strength
Best fit
Data/integration-heavy fleets
Compliance and safety-led transport fleets
Our View The key difference is not GPS capability.
Geotab starts from the data. Teletrac Navman starts from the operational and compliance workflow.
That distinction becomes increasingly important as fleet complexity grows.
Which Should You Compare First?
Your main requirement Our starting choice
Deep vehicle data
Geotab
EV fleet management
Geotab
Fleet electrification
Geotab
OEM connectivity
Geotab
Advanced integrations
Geotab
Tachograph/compliance
Teletrac Navman
Daily vehicle checks
Teletrac Navman
AI dashcams
Teletrac Navman
Driver coaching
Teletrac Navman
Transport workflows
Teletrac Navman
Large mixed fleet
Compare both
Enterprise telematics
Compare both
Geotab vs Teletrac Navman for Fleet Tracking Both provide much more than basic GPS.
Geotab’s fleet-management packages all include GPS tracking, while higher plans add engine data, accelerometer information, EV support and other advanced features.
Teletrac Navman’s telematics proposition combines GPS with sensor information, engine diagnostics, geofencing, job dispatch and wider operational data.
Our View Basic tracking is essentially a draw.
If all you need is:
location
journey history
geofencing
both platforms are probably more sophisticated than necessary- the comparison becomes valuable when you need to decide what to do with the data after it has been collected.
Geotab vs Teletrac Navman for Compliance & Tachograph This is one of Teletrac Navman’s clearest strengths.
Its UK platform currently emphasises:
tachograph workflows
driver-hours management
daily vehicle checks
defect reporting
automated records
compliance reporting
Its current fleet-management platform explicitly positions these tools around simplifying fleet compliance.
Geotab also supports European regulatory requirements and offers an EU Regulatory package with additional compliance functionality layered over its core fleet-management software.
Our View: Teletrac Navman Wins This Category If compliance is one of the main reasons for buying the platform, we would compare Teletrac Navman first.
The compliance workflow feels more central to its core UK transport proposition.
Geotab remains relevant where regulatory functionality needs to sit inside a broader data and integration strategy.
Geotab vs Teletrac Navman for Video Telematics Teletrac Navman has a particularly strong native video proposition.
Its current UK camera range includes:
AI-powered IQ Camera
dual-facing Smart Dashcam
multi-camera systems
real-time driver alerts
video-supported coaching
centralised footage access within TN360
Its multi-camera proposition can be configured for standards and operational requirements including DVS, FORS and CLOCS.
Geotab also supports video telematics through its own platform and Marketplace ecosystem.
Our View: Teletrac Navman Wins This Category If integrated cameras and video-led safety are central to the purchase, Teletrac Navman would be our first comparison.
Its camera, coaching and compliance proposition feels tightly integrated into the same transport environment.
Geotab remains a strong option where video is one part of a wider custom fleet-data ecosystem.
For more detail, see our Video Telematics & Fleet Dashcams UK
Geotab vs Teletrac Navman for Driver Safety & Coaching Both platforms can monitor events such as:
speeding
harsh braking
aggressive acceleration
cornering
idling
Geotab provides configurable driver rules, alerts, dashboards and coaching functionality.
Teletrac Navman combines telematics with:
driver scorecards
AI camera events
real-time feedback
personalised coaching
driver rewards
Its current platform is particularly explicit about using video telematics to measure driver risk and coach safer performance.
Our View: Teletrac Navman Gets the Edge For a transport fleet where safety coaching is central, Teletrac Navman has the stronger native workflow.
Geotab remains very strong where driver safety needs to be highly configurable and combined with broader analytics.
Geotab vs Teletrac Navman for Maintenance & Diagnostics Geotab has a particularly strong diagnostic-data proposition.
Its higher software packages add engine and accelerometer data, while its wider platform is designed around using vehicle information to support maintenance and operational decisions.
Teletrac Navman also captures engine diagnostics including:
fuel efficiency
odometer readings
fault codes
and uses this information to power digital fleet-maintenance workflows, their fleet software also includes daily walkaround checks and maintenance workflows.
Our View This depends on what you need.
Geotab gets the edge for deep underlying vehicle data. Teletrac Navman gets the edge where vehicle checks, defects and maintenance need to sit inside a transport workflow.
Geotab vs Teletrac Navman for Electric Vehicles This is Geotab’s clearest win.
Geotab currently supports rich EV data across more than 300 models and can provide information including:
battery state of charge
battery health
charging
driving energy
range
It also provides:
EV Suitability Assessment
charging analysis
energy-use reporting
charging-cost analysis
charging integrations
Teletrac Navman also supports sustainability and EV fleet management, including EV charging visibility and energy-management tools.
Our View: Geotab Wins This Category If fleet electrification is a strategic priority, we would compare Geotab first.
Its EV proposition is considerably deeper and more mature.
Teletrac Navman remains relevant where EVs form part of a wider transport compliance and safety requirement.
Geotab vs Teletrac Navman Integrations & APIs Geotab’s open architecture is one of its most important differentiators.
Its wider platform supports:
custom APIs
SDK-based development
Marketplace applications
OEM data integrations
specialist fleet applications
Geotab continues to expand its OEM integrations, including adding additional specialist equipment and EV connections during 2026.
Teletrac Navman also offers fleet-management integrations.
Its current UK platform highlights integrations including:
FleetCheck
MaxOptra
Transport Exchange Group
covering fleet compliance, scheduling and transport workflows.
Our View: Geotab Wins for Extensibility If the telematics platform needs to become part of a complex enterprise data environment, Geotab has the stronger case.
Teletrac Navman’s integrations are still commercially useful, particularly where they solve known transport workflows.
Geotab vs Teletrac Navman for Vehicle Checks & Operational Workflows Teletrac Navman has a particularly practical transport-workflow proposition.
Its current platform includes:
daily walkaround checks
defect reporting
maintenance workflows
dispatch
driver messaging
workflow apps
Geotab can also support these processes through MyGeotab and its wider partner ecosystem.
Our View: Teletrac Navman Gets the Edge for Native Transport Workflow If your objective is to digitise the day-to-day processes between transport office, vehicle and driver, Teletrac Navman is particularly compelling.
Geotab may be better if your organisation wants to assemble a more customised workflow around its data platform.
Geotab vs Teletrac Navman Pricing Neither has one universal UK fleet price.
Geotab pricing can depend on:
fleet size
GO hardware
OEM connectivity
software package
Marketplace products
installation
reseller arrangement
Geotab currently offers software packages including Base, Pro, ProPlus and EU Regulatory, with functionality varying between plans.
Teletrac Navman pricing can depend on:
number and type of vehicles
telematics hardware
cameras
compliance modules
driver tools
maintenance functionality
integrations
Its UK site currently routes buyers through a product builder and tailored solution process rather than presenting one universal fleet price.
Our View Do not compare these systems using a headline monthly GPS price.
A Teletrac Navman package containing:
cameras
tachograph
driver coaching
daily checks
is not equivalent to a Geotab package configured mainly for:
vehicle data
EVs
reporting
integrations
Ask both providers for:
total first-year cost + ongoing annual cost + minimum contract value.
For wider benchmarks, see our Vehicle Tracking Cost UK
Compare Geotab & Teletrac Navman Prices
Geotab vs Teletrac Navman by Fleet Size
Fleet size Our starting view
1–5 simple vehicles
Consider simpler providers first
5–20 vehicles
Teletrac Navman can make sense where compliance/video matter
20–50 vehicles
Compare both based on operational requirements
50–100 vehicles
Compare both closely
100+ vehicles
Both are strong enterprise options
Large EV fleet
Geotab particularly strong
Large HGV/transport fleet
Teletrac Navman particularly strong
Integration-heavy mixed fleet
Geotab particularly strong
Geotab vs Teletrac Navman by Industry
Industry/use case Our first comparison
EV fleet
Geotab
Fleet electrification
Geotab
Data/integration-heavy enterprise
Geotab
Mixed OEM fleet
Geotab
Haulage
Teletrac Navman
HGV transport
Teletrac Navman
Safety-led fleet
Teletrac Navman
Compliance-heavy fleet
Teletrac Navman
Large mixed fleet
Compare both
General enterprise telematics
Compare both
Geotab vs Teletrac Navman Pros and Cons Geotab Pros
Excellent vehicle and engine data
Excellent EV fleet-management proposition
Strong OEM integration strategy
Open SDK and integration architecture
Highly customisable
Strong diagnostics
Large partner ecosystem
Geotab Cons
Can be more platform than a straightforward transport fleet needs
Some specialist functionality comes through marketplace solutions
Implementation can be more complex where significant customisation is required
Teletrac Navman has the stronger native video/compliance workflow proposition
Teletrac Navman Pros
Strong transport compliance proposition
Excellent integrated video telematics
Strong driver coaching and safety workflows
Daily walkaround checks and defect management
Integrated maintenance workflows
Practical fleet operations and dispatch functionality
Strong fit for HGV and transport fleets
Teletrac Navman Cons
Geotab has the stronger specialist EV proposition
Geotab places more emphasis on open extensibility and deep customisation
Advanced cameras and compliance modules can increase package scope and cost
May provide more compliance functionality than simpler fleets require
When Would We Choose Geotab? We would put Geotab first where:
EV fleet management is strategically important
fleet electrification is planned
deep engine and vehicle data matter
OEM integrations are important
fleet information needs to feed external systems
the organisation wants to build custom telematics workflows
Our View Geotab’s strongest differentiator is the depth and flexibility of its fleet-data environment.
Read our Geotab Vehicle Tracking review
When Would We Choose Teletrac Navman? We would put Teletrac Navman first where:
tachograph and compliance are major priorities
HGV or transport operations dominate the fleet
video safety is central
drivers need real-time coaching
daily vehicle checks need digitising
fleet operations need stronger workflows
Our View Teletrac Navman’s strongest differentiator is how tightly safety, compliance and transport workflow sit around the core telematics platform.
Read our Teletrac Navman review
Questions to Ask Geotab and Teletrac Navman Before Choosing Give both providers the same questions:
What is the total monthly cost for our fleet?
Which hardware is required?
Which diagnostic signals can you read?
Can you use our factory/OEM telematics data?
Which EV makes and models are supported?
How does driver scoring work?
Which camera options are available?
Which AI driving events can be detected?
How does driver coaching work?
Can tachograph data be managed remotely?
How are daily vehicle checks completed?
What happens when a defect is reported?
How are maintenance workflows managed?
Which integrations are available?
Is API access included?
Can we create custom dashboards?
How is fleet data exported?
What support is included?
What is the minimum contract term?
What is the total minimum-contract value?
Our View Make both providers demonstrate the same three scenarios.
For example:
“A driver records a vehicle defect before leaving the depot. Show us exactly what happens next.”
“A risky driving event is detected. Show us what the driver and fleet manager see.”
“We want to replace part of our diesel fleet with EVs. Show us how the system supports that decision.”
That will expose the difference between the two platforms much faster than a generic sales demonstration.
Our Verdict: Geotab or Teletrac Navman? Both are strong fleet-management platforms, but they serve different enterprise priorities particularly well.
Choose Geotab for comparison first if your priorities are:
vehicle data
EV fleet management
fleet electrification
OEM connectivity
advanced diagnostics
open integrations
custom fleet-data architecture
Choose Teletrac Navman for comparison first if your priorities are:
HGV/transport operations
tachograph and compliance
driver safety
video telematics
driver coaching
daily vehicle checks
operational workflows
CYBC Verdict Geotab wins for fleet data, EVs and extensibility.
Teletrac Navman wins for transport compliance, video safety and operational workflow.
For a large fleet with both requirements, compare both.
The core buying question is:: Are you trying to build a more intelligent fleet-data platform, or run a safer and more compliant transport operation?
That is where we would start.
Compare Geotab, Teletrac Navman & Alternative Fleet Systems
Free quotes • No obligation • Compare providers based on your fleet requirements
Geotab vs Teletrac Navman FAQs Is Geotab better than Teletrac Navman?
Geotab may be the stronger choice where EV fleet management, deep vehicle data, OEM connectivity and integrations are major priorities.
Is Teletrac Navman better than Geotab?
Teletrac Navman may be the stronger fit where transport compliance, video telematics, driver coaching and day-to-day fleet workflows are more important.
Which is better for EV fleets?
We would compare Geotab first. Geotab currently supports rich EV data across more than 300 models and provides specialist fleet-electrification and charging tools.
Which is better for HGV fleets?
We would generally compare Teletrac Navman first where tachograph, compliance, cameras and transport workflows are central requirements.
Which is better for dashcams?
Teletrac Navman gets our preference for a native integrated-video proposition. Its current range includes AI, dual-facing and multi-camera systems linked to TN360.
Which is better for driver coaching?
Teletrac Navman has a particularly strong safety-coaching proposition combining driver scorecards, video and personalised coaching workflows.
Which is better for vehicle diagnostics?
Geotab gets our preference where detailed engine and vehicle data are especially important.
Which is better for compliance?
Teletrac Navman has the stronger transport-compliance proposition, particularly around tachograph workflows, driver hours, daily checks and defect reporting.
Which is better for integrations?
Geotab gets our preference where open APIs, OEM data and a highly extensible fleet-data environment are priorities.
Do both provide GPS tracking?
Yes. Both provide advanced GPS vehicle tracking alongside wider telematics and fleet-management functionality.
Do both provide maintenance tools?
Yes. Both support maintenance, although Geotab is particularly strong on underlying vehicle data while Teletrac Navman places stronger emphasis on maintenance workflows and digital inspections.
Which is cheaper?
There is no universal answer because both are configured according to fleet requirements and can include very different hardware, compliance and software packages.
Should we compare both?
Yes, particularly for larger fleets where data, compliance, safety and integration requirements overlap.
Compare Geotab vs Teletrac Navman Quotes Before requesting quotes, establish:
fleet size
vehicle types
ICE and EV mix
HGV requirements
tachograph requirements
driver-safety requirements
camera requirements
maintenance requirements
vehicle-check requirements
OEM connectivity
integration requirements
Then ask both providers to quote and demonstrate against the same requirement.
This gives you a much more useful comparison than simply counting features.
Compare Geotab, Teletrac Navman & Other Fleet Systems
Free quotes • No obligation • Compare UK fleet-management providers
Related Fleet Management Guides
Hi, I’m Ally Cox , a senior copywriter and blogger at CompareYourBusinessCosts.co.uk, the UK’s trusted platform for comparing business services.over a decade of experience in the B2B sector, I specialise in simplifying complex topics like leased lines, VoIP, business energy, HR and payroll solutions, accounting software, and EPOS systems .HR, copywriting, and business operations- from clocking-in systems to card machines and office technology .informed, confident decisions when choosing products and services that improve efficiency and save money.
